Charles C. Steward Machine Company v. Harwell G. Davis Legal Briefs and Appendices
-
No requestable containers
-
Ask a Question
Scope and Contents
Charles C. Steward Machine Company, Petitioner v, Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue. (1936) This case before the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the constitutionality of the unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act. The chief points at issue were: 1. Whether federal taxes could be levied on employment and wages and whether the exceptions granted did not make the law class legislation in that it applied to some groups but not to others. 2. Whether the federal government, by the use of its taxing powers, had coerced the states into dealing with unemployment compensation which should be the exclusive concern of the states. 3. Whether the federal government was seeking revenue for the treasury or providing a program for dealing with unemployment. 4. Whether the standards to which the state laws were required to conform in order that the 90 percent offset be granted constituted an Invasion of the rights of the states. The opinion held that the law was constitutional.
Dates
- 1936
Language of Materials
Collection material in English
Conditions Governing Access
Access to the collections in the Kheel Center is restricted. Please contact a reference archivist for access to these materials.
Conditions Governing Use
This collection must be used in keeping with the Kheel Center Information Sheet and Procedures for Document Use.
Biographical / Historical
This case before the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the constitutionality of the unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act. The chief points at issue were:
1. Whether federal taxes could be levied on employment and wages and whether the exceptions granted did not make the law class legislation in that it applied to some groups but not to others.
2. Whether the federal government, by the use of its taxing powers, had coerced the states into dealing with unemployment compensation which should be the exclusive concern of the states.
3. Whether the federal government was seeking revenue for the treasury or providing a program for dealing with unemployment.
4. Whether the standards to which the state laws were required to conform in order that the 90 percent offset be granted constituted an Invasion of the rights of the states.
The opinion held that the law was constitutional.
Extent
0.5 cubic feet
Abstract
Charles C. Steward Machine Company, Petitioner v, Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue. (1936)
Quantity:
0.5 linear ft.
Forms of Material:
Records (documents).
General
- Contact Information:
- Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives Martin P. Catherwood Library 227 Ives Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 255-3183 kheel_center@cornell.edu http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/kheel-center
- Compiled by:
- Kheel Staff, November 07, 2005
- EAD encoding:
- Kheel Staff, March 11, 2019
- Title
- Steward Machine Company Records
- Status
- Completed
- Author
- Compiled by Kheel Staff
- Date
- March 11, 2019
- Language of description
- Undetermined
- Script of description
- Code for undetermined script
Revision Statements
- 02/23/2024: This resource was modified by the ArchivesSpace Preprocessor developed by the Harvard Library (https://github.com/harvard-library/archivesspace-preprocessor)
Repository Details
Part of the Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation & Archives Repository
227 Ives Hall
Ithaca NY 14853