Skip to main content

Charles C. Steward Machine Company v. Harwell G. Davis Legal Briefs and Appendices

 Collection
Identifier: 5350

Scope and Contents

Charles C. Steward Machine Company, Petitioner v, Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue. (1936) This case before the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the constitutionality of the unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act. The chief points at issue were: 1. Whether federal taxes could be levied on employment and wages and whether the exceptions granted did not make the law class legislation in that it applied to some groups but not to others. 2. Whether the federal government, by the use of its taxing powers, had coerced the states into dealing with unemployment compensation which should be the exclusive concern of the states. 3. Whether the federal government was seeking revenue for the treasury or providing a program for dealing with unemployment. 4. Whether the standards to which the state laws were required to conform in order that the 90 percent offset be granted constituted an Invasion of the rights of the states. The opinion held that the law was constitutional.

Dates

  • 1936

Language of Materials

Collection material in English

Conditions Governing Access

Access to the collections in the Kheel Center is restricted. Please contact a reference archivist for access to these materials.

Conditions Governing Use

This collection must be used in keeping with the Kheel Center Information Sheet and Procedures for Document Use.

Biographical / Historical

This case before the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the constitutionality of the unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act. The chief points at issue were:

1. Whether federal taxes could be levied on employment and wages and whether the exceptions granted did not make the law class legislation in that it applied to some groups but not to others.

2. Whether the federal government, by the use of its taxing powers, had coerced the states into dealing with unemployment compensation which should be the exclusive concern of the states.

3. Whether the federal government was seeking revenue for the treasury or providing a program for dealing with unemployment.

4. Whether the standards to which the state laws were required to conform in order that the 90 percent offset be granted constituted an Invasion of the rights of the states.

The opinion held that the law was constitutional.

Extent

0.5 cubic feet

Abstract

Charles C. Steward Machine Company, Petitioner v, Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue. (1936)

Quantity:

0.5 linear ft.

Forms of Material:

Records (documents).

General

Contact Information:
Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives Martin P. Catherwood Library 227 Ives Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 255-3183 kheel_center@cornell.edu http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/kheel-center
Compiled by:
Kheel Staff, November 07, 2005
EAD encoding:
Kheel Staff, March 11, 2019
Title
Steward Machine Company Records
Status
Completed
Author
Compiled by Kheel Staff
Date
March 11, 2019
Language of description
Undetermined
Script of description
Code for undetermined script

Revision Statements

  • 02/23/2024: This resource was modified by the ArchivesSpace Preprocessor developed by the Harvard Library (https://github.com/harvard-library/archivesspace-preprocessor)

Repository Details

Part of the Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation & Archives Repository

Contact:
227 Ives Hall
Ithaca NY 14853