Correspondence, 1937

12/1/37-12/29/37; Correspondence reporting on the Yates American Machine Co. case XII-C-68 and the union's failure to file a charge against the employer; the field examiner's conduct in the Swift and Co. cases XI-C-149, XI-R-51; Judge Padway's position in the Allis-Chalmers case XII-R-40; Edwin S. Smith's dissent in the Combustion Engineering Co. case; Fahy on arguments in the Consolidated Edison case; question of language in the Waterbury Mfg. Co. decision; possibility of Dudley (Trial Examiner) filing prejury charge against union witness in Union Drawn Steel Co. case; lockout in the Ford case; discussion of licensed and unlicensed personnel on the Grace Lines Inc. case R-157, R-110; economic data in the Liggett Drug Co. case I-C-413; the Portland Lumber controversy; the American France et al case R-157 and Harry Bridges; amendments to the Wagner Bill (includes discussion of LaFollette's amendments, Garrision's suggestions and the Burke Resolution;) Madden to Hon. Fred Bierman (U.S. House of Representatives) refuting the charge the NLRB is C.I.O. controlled; Green's contention that longshoremen do not have jurisdiction over warehousemen and mill workers; Blakenhorn's "Congressmen and Freedom of the Press" and the ACLU's support of the Board's position; Madden's and George Googe's discussion of the Mobile Steamship Association (the Alabama Longshoremen's situation) specifically closed-shop contracts, contains an example of institutional racism.